Managed Infrastructure
L1s are deployed and managed through robust, automated infrastructure architecture, designed to meet the most rigorous standards and service-level agreements.
L1s are deployed and managed through robust, automated infrastructure architecture, designed to meet the most rigorous standards and service-level agreements.
The AvaCloud client services and support teams advise pre- and post-deployment, through migrations and go-lives, with co-marketing for community amplification.
AvaCloud accelerates your time to market with native integrations and no-to-low-code tooling, all in the same portal as your managed infrastructure.
Production-grade attributes and platform-wide metrics from real deployments, measured, not marketed.
How the major networks compare on the criteria that matter to institutions: privacy, interoperability, developer ecosystem, performance, operations, and compliance fit.
| Network | Privacy & Confidentiality | Permissioning & Governance | Interoperability | Developer Ecosystem & Tooling | Performance & Finality | Operational Model | Compliance Posture | Composability & Liquidity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avalanche L1s Configurable(Private → Public) | Strong Privacy at transaction, contract, and validator levels. ZK proofs via AvaCloud. | Strong Fully configurable — private or public with a parameter change. Custom validator sets. | Strong Native Interchain Messaging (ICM). No bridges needed. Optional C-Chain connection. | Strong Full EVM + Solidity. Custom VMs in Rust or Go. Entire Ethereum toolchain available. | Strong Sub-2s finality in production. 4,500+ TPS. Fixed fees post-Etna upgrade. | Strong Managed via AvaCloud SLA. Self-hosted also viable. ~$50–100/mo per validator. | Strong ZK-based compliance tooling. Proven: Bergen County, CadDAV, Citi, FIFA. | Strong Optional C-Chain access for DeFi and public liquidity. Private-first, public when ready. |
Canton Public-Permissioned | Strong Sub-transaction privacy by default. Participants see only their relevant data. | Strong Identity-aware, permissioned participants. Consortium governance via Digital Asset. | Medium Global Synchronizer trial live (32 participants). Canton-only — no external chain access. | Weak DAML required. Small talent pool. Not EVM-compatible. High hiring cost. | Medium Designed for institutional throughput. Scalability not yet battle-tested. | Medium Managed by Digital Asset. Undisclosed joining fee. Limited self-hosted option. | Strong Built for regulated finance. Strong institutional alignment. | Weak No public liquidity. Canton Coin or USD only. No DeFi access. |
Hyperledger Fabric Private-Permissioned | Strong Private channels between known members. MSP enforces identity. No shared state. | Strong Consortium-governed. Known participants. Well-understood enterprise access controls. | Weak Interoperability is custom-built. No native cross-chain messaging. Closed by design. | Medium Go, Java, Node.js. Not EVM-compatible. Mature but siloed. High DevOps overhead. | Medium ~3,500 TPS. Sub-second finality. Degrades with complex endorsement policies. | Strong Fully self-hosted and on-prem. No external dependencies. Mature enterprise playbooks. | Strong Full auditability. Established in trade finance, supply chain, healthcare. | Weak No public liquidity or DeFi. Closed consortium only. No path to public markets. |
Ethereum Mainnet Public-Permissionless | Weak Global shared state. All transactions visible. Privacy requires application-layer work. | Weak No native permissioning. Role-based controls must be built at application layer. | Medium Bridge-dependent. CDP and LayerZero available but add trust assumptions. | Strong Largest Solidity ecosystem. Richest tooling. Best recruiting and open-source coverage. | Weak ~30 TPS. 12s block times. Gas fees spike to $50–360+ during congestion. | Medium No SLA, no managed option. Institutions cannot control validators or network parameters. | Medium Full public auditability. Compliance must be engineered at application level. | Strong Deepest DeFi ecosystem. Reference layer for tokenized assets and stablecoins. |
Base Ethereum L2(OP Stack) | Weak No native privacy. Public mempool. No permissioning at chain level. | Weak No native permissioning. Coinbase operates sequencer — centralized control point. | Medium Settles to Ethereum L1. 7-day withdrawal window. OP Superchain interop developing. | Strong Full EVM compatibility. Strong Coinbase ecosystem. Full Ethereum toolchain. | Medium 2,000+ TPS. Cheap fees (~$0.001–$0.010s). Soft finality ~2s. L1 finality 7 days. | Weak Sequencer run by Coinbase. No self-hosted option. No enterprise SLA. | Medium Coinbase regulatory credibility. No native compliance tooling. | Strong Growing TVL. Stablecoin activity. Coinbase retail and institutional distribution. |
Arbitrum Ethereum L2(Nitro) | Weak No native privacy. Fraud proofs require public data. App-layer work required. | Medium Orbit chains allow some access controls. Standard Arbitrum One has no permissioning. | Medium Settles to Ethereum L1. 7-day challenge period. Orbit chains communicate within ecosystem. | Strong Strongest EVM parity. Stylus adds Rust and C++. Large DeFi-native developer base. | Medium 4,000+ TPS. Low fees. Soft finality ~1s. 7-day withdrawal limits capital efficiency. | Medium Sequencer by Offchain Labs. Enterprise SLA. Repeated DAG governance. No managed deployment. | Strong Mature audit ecosystem. Compliance built at application layer. | Strong Highest L2 TVL. Deep DeFi composability. Strong institutional DeFi presence. |
Solana Public-Permissionless | Weak Global public ledger. SPL Confidential Transfers are opt-in and limited in scope. | Weak No network-level permissioning. Open validator set. App-layer only. | Medium Wormhole and bridges available. No native atomic cross-chain messaging. | Medium Rust and C/C++. Not EVM-compatible. Growing ecosystem but requires developer retraining. | Strong 65,000+ theoretical TPS. Sub-second finality (~$0.000025/tx). History of network outages. | Weak Public validators. No enterprise SLA. Repeated network outages (2022–2023). | Weak No native compliance tooling. Less mature audit ecosystem than EVM. | Strong Deep consumer DeFi. Growing stablecoin activity (Visa, PayPal PYUSD). |
Configurable (Private → Public)
Public-Permissioned
Private-Permissioned
Public-Permissionless
Ethereum L2 (OP Stack)
Ethereum L2 (Nitro)
Public-Permissionless
Comparison reflects publicly available information and AvaCloud customer engagements as of Q2 2026. Client logos referenced for context, pending legal approval.
Thirty minutes to walk through your use case, the business case behind it, and what AvaCloud could look like in production.